PDA

View Full Version : Virginia Tech probe finds no fault in massacre response



MedicCook
08-23-2007, 12:02 AM
Virginia Tech probe finds no fault in massacre response

http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/2007/US/08/22/vtech.review/art.vatech.ap.jpg

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- An internal review of the actions Virginia Tech took in the hours after student Seung-Hui Cho's April shooting spree makes suggestions to boost security but assigns no blame for the deadliest school shooting in U.S. history.

The report was requested by Virginia Tech President Charles Steger. It was released Wednesday and includes reviews of the university's security systems, communications and counseling services that dealt with at-risk students.

It recommends many improvements -- ranging from locks on classroom doors to overhauling the campus communications system -- but doesn't fault any university or police officials for the way they handled the massacre.

Cho killed 32 fellow students and faculty members before killing himself April 16 on the Blacksburg, Virginia, campus.

"We at Virginia Tech have been forever changed by the crimes of this severely disturbed young man," Steger said during a news conference Wednesday. Watch Steger announce the results »

"He was determined to commit murder, planned the crime meticulously and managed to conceal his homicidal urges from all of law enforcement authorities, and the mental health experts who tried to help him and presumably from his own family," Steger said.

The 23-year-old student had been described as a loner by his roommates, and the violence in his writings had worried his teachers. After Cho expressed suicidal thoughts to a roommate, who then alerted others, Cho was given a psychological evaluation and a judge ordered he be treated.

But that order was not entered into the criminal background database, and Cho was able to buy the two guns he used in the shooting spree.

Many students criticized the university for not giving them sufficient warning after Cho's first two victims were found dead in West Ambler Johnston dormitory.

In the days following the shooting, Steger defended the university's actions, saying that he initially thought the dorm room shooting was "a domestic fight, perhaps a murder-suicide."

"It was characterized by our security people as being contained to that dorm room," he said in April.

The report released Wednesday says there was good cooperation and sound agreements between Virginia Tech and local police. It also says that the campus communications system was "dramatically stressed," but performed adequately during the crisis. The review recommends replacing the entire system.

Other recommendations include a centrally controlled card key system, mass notification techniques within classrooms, a people locator system and more frequent emergency exercises.

One area of concern in the report is the way the university identifies and supports at-risk students. The report says "the system may not be robust enough to provide the kind of analysis that is warranted by more complex, high risk cases."

The committee recommends expanding a student group that works with at-risk students, creating a threat assessment team that would examine the most complex cases and improving communications with external agencies that treat troubled students.

The university's report comes days before a high-profile independent group -- formed by Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine -- is scheduled to release its broader investigation.

Kaine's Virginia Tech Review Panel, which includes former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, is looking at the shooting and police response, as well as the mental health system that failed to identify Cho as a threat and effectively deal with him in the months before the massacre.

School started this week for 28,000 Virginia Tech students.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/08/22/vtech.review/index.html

sws4420
08-23-2007, 06:45 AM
What fault could they assign to one gunman? They can't keep track of every student's thoughts and motivations.

MedicCook
08-23-2007, 05:41 PM
I guess when they get information that the gunman left the campus they should have ignored that info and just winged it.

trojanmiro
08-23-2007, 06:46 PM
i think more coulda been done after the first shooting. i think thats reason enough to cancel classes for the day instead of carry on like nothing happened.

MedicCook
08-23-2007, 07:07 PM
Dismissing all the students into a panic would have been much worse actually. It would have created a huge cluster of people and would have made the attempts to locate the shooter more difficult.

sws4420
08-23-2007, 08:46 PM
I doubt anyone would have had the thought to create a campuswide panic after what seemed like an isolated incident.

MedicCook
08-23-2007, 08:49 PM
If they cancelled classes saying that they have had a shooting and are still on the lookout for him it would have caused a panic. When RPI had the dead body that turned out to be a suicide they locked down the campus and class rooms until they were able to determine that it was safe for the students to be out on campus.

Crystal
08-31-2007, 12:36 PM
If they would have gone to even a lockdown after the first shooting then I don't think as many people would have been killed. He went to the post office or some shit after he killed the bf & gf didn't he? Which meant if they cancelled classes and put the school on lockdown he wouldn't have gotten back in. Which would have saved 30 lives.

I think the school could have done more. I understand it's a big school, but if something violent like that happens (the first shooting) no matter what the reason.......I would expect the school to be closed.