'Little Black Book' teaches kids 'gay' sex

[sws4420]

Massachusetts group decries aggressive pro-homosexual advocacy

A Massachusetts activist organization today will mark the one-year anniversary of same-sex marriage in the state by discussing the "dark underbelly" of the institution in front of Boston's City Hall.

The Article 8 Alliance" claims the state's schools have become more active in pushing homosexuality with students, pointing to an April 30 event at Brookline High School.

Sponsored by the Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network, the event, said the Article 8 Alliance, featured a "hard-core pornographic homosexual 'how-to' booklet given to hundreds of kids."

"The book was prominently distributed at the first table, right after registration, where everyone would be sure to go," the group states on its website.

The booklet, entitled "The Little Black Book – Queer in the 21st Century," contains what the activist group calls "deadly misinformation on health."

Included in the booklet are graphic descriptions of homosexual conduct, including "fisting," along with a photo-spread discussion of condoms and instructions on how to put them on.

Also included is a list of homosexual bars and clubs in the Boston area "for the discerning queerboy." The Article 8 Alliance points out the students attending the event were of middle-school and high-school age.

The booklet mentions abstaining from risky activity, and then states, "But how much fun is that?"

Brian Camenker, director of Article 8 Alliance slammed the pro-homosexual agenda in Massachusetts.

"Contrary to the rosy picture painted in the mainstream media, we've seen an intensification of undemocratic, anti-free-speech activities throughout our state – in the schools, in government and in the media," he said in a statement. "Alternative points of view are routinely drowned out by ignoring the message, intimidation, name-calling or lack of proper notification. Even pro-family churches now hesitate to speak out on this moral issue, since it has been politicized by the radical homosexuals and their allies."

Continued Camenker: "Meanwhile, our Legislature and governor continue to support gay clubs in our public schools, which draw our young people into this dangerous and destructive lifestyle," saying he had never seen anything as "bad" as the "Little Black Book."


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44306

[trojanmiro]

a old friend of mine has an interesting theory on being gay. he believes the human species genetics are changing ir order to adapt to the overpopulation threat, and that it will eventually be an all homosexual society until nature deems otherwise.

[sws4420]

Included in the booklet are graphic descriptions of homosexual conduct, including "fisting," along with a photo-spread discussion of condoms and instructions on how to put them on.
As long as it covers everything that they really need to know.


The booklet mentions abstaining from risky activity, and then states, "But how much fun is that?"
Yeah, engaging in risky behavior among a population with a higher HIV rate is probably a pretty good idea for kids to learn as early as possible.

That's a theory I had awhile back, Mike. It makes sense, but it doesn't make it any easier for me to accept the whole concept. God knows we could use a reduction in birth rates, but the ways don't always justify the means.

[trojanmiro]

i personally dont find the theory to be true myself or the chinese population would have been nothing but raging homos by now.

[sws4420]

The Chinese people aren't really people. They're robots. Their eyes are so small so they can save on production costs.

[mb*]

The Chinese people aren't really people. They're robots. Their eyes are so small so they can save on production costs.

:rotflmao: :rolleyes:

[trashmonster]

a old friend of mine has an interesting theory on being gay. he believes the human species genetics are changing ir order to adapt to the overpopulation threat, and that it will eventually be an all homosexual society until nature deems otherwise.

ummmmm no...being gay isnt a mutation in the genes

[trashmonster]

Yeah, engaging in risky behavior among a population with a higher HIV rate is probably a pretty good idea for kids to learn as early as possible.

.

the highest segment of the population reporting new cases of HIV infection are...STRAIGHT males ages 15-25.

[trashmonster]

hell no im not anti-gay...but i am gay

[trojanmiro]

Finally! Some one on the board that isn't anti-gay. :wub:

Trash is correct. Gay men are alot more educated on AIDS and protect themselves. Young, straight males make up alot of the new cases because they think it wont happen to them so why wear a condom.

these aren't anti gay comments, they are fact however. except my friends theory. i found it interesting enough to post it to create some chatter on the board.

while straight males between 15-25 may have more new cases, when you break it down to percentage of population the gay males have a much higher percentage. mindy i have shown you fact on this before and if you wish i will again do research on it.

[trashmonster]

Excellent! :wub: I have alot of gay friends so that makes me a fag hag.
LMAOOO sounds cool to me :biglaff:

[trashmonster]

you are talking ratio...im talking lives.

[trashmonster]

But in responce to the article itself...as a parent i would be pissed off. i dont care what kind of sex it is...you can teach kids how to have safe sex without showing them how to have sex...thats kind of an oxymoron isnt it??

[trojanmiro]

these arent true stats, im just gonna pull numbers out of the air here. lets break it down to a group of 20 random people. we will say 5 are gay and 15 are straight. of the 15 people that are straigh 4 are hiv positive as opposed to 2 of the 5 of gay men. so in "lives" straight people have a higher fatality rate. but in percentage wise the gay population is more at risk. thats the only point i was trying to make.

[trojanmiro]

MindyL518 is my AOL sn if you want to check out some pics of my boyz.

Mike, in my experence gay men are very aware of how hiv is spread and protect themselves. Waterworks has a condom jar at the entrance and holds monthly hiv testing and counseling. That is something you just don't see in straight bars.

Didn't you even admit you don't wear condoms? I hear the same thing from my straight male friends "I don't wear condoms because I don't like them". It is stupid. At least gay men know that they are more likely to get hiv and take precautions.

i dont wear them. but i also have a risk evaluation logic that i apply. not to sound racist, but i wont engage in sexual activity of anyone that has been exposed to the black population either, for the simple fact that of straight males, the black population has staggering hiv percentage in that group.

[trashmonster]

these arent true stats, im just gonna pull numbers out of the air here. lets break it down to a group of 20 random people. we will say 5 are gay and 15 are straight. of the 15 people that are straigh 4 are hiv positive as opposed to 2 of the 5 of gay men. so in "lives" straight people have a higher fatality rate. but in percentage wise the gay population is more at risk. thats the only point i was trying to make.

but see thats the problem though...it may have been 4 out of 15 lets saay 5 years ago...but now its more like 5 or 6...doesnt sound like a huge leap but it is. i think everyone needs educated on HIV/AIDS. and anyone sexually active needs to be tested every 6 months. and i hate to be the one to break it to you...rubbers break.

[trashmonster]

i dont wear them. but i also have a risk evaluation logic that i apply. not to sound racist, but i wont engage in sexual activity of anyone that has been exposed to the black population either, for the simple fact that of straight males, the black population has staggering hiv percentage in that group.

so your basically playing the numbers then...good luck with that

[trojanmiro]

your location drastically effects the percentage of these statistics also. in urban communitys it prolly is 6. in rural communitys i believe it to be about 1.
the fact that nyc makes up atleast half of the population of the state of ny is an example of this. the more people in a small amount of area leads to disease spreading at a much higher rate then the average statistics, such as rural area are lower then statistics.

[trashmonster]

i live in kansas KANSAS home of oz...dorthy all that crap...i have full blown aids and my partner has HIV. we live in a town of about 60,000 and i was AMAZED at the number of people here who have HIV. but ya i see your point and even agree with it...its the playing of numbers things again.

[Queenie]

It frightens me how many guys don't wear condoms.... Seriously one little, oops I don't have a condom, can kill you.

[trashmonster]

that sucks...sorry for your loss

[trojanmiro]

i am not saying i am not at risk by any means, but i do have the odds set up in my favor. if i had alot more partners knotched into my bed post id be more concerned, but i believe my number to be humble, and the girls that i have chosen l deem at the lower end of the risk scale. i have been tested last year just for shits and giggles cause your right, you never know, and i passed with a 65. lol. i jsut think that by applying logic to certain situations in your lifestyle that you can curb statistics.