PDA

View Full Version : Bush taps Roberts to succeed Rehnquist



sws4420
09-05-2005, 09:49 AM
Move would promote a man still being considered as an associate justice

WASHINGTON - Moving swiftly, President George W. Bush said he will nominate John Roberts to succeed William H. Rehnquist as chief justice of the Supreme Court.

The move would promote to the Supreme Court’s top job a man who currently is being considered as one of eight associate justices.

Naming Roberts for chief justice was about the only way to ensure all nine seats on the court are filled when it begins its next term Oct. 3. If the court began a new term with only eight justices, it could have resulted in 4-4 ties on controversial cases.

The president made the announcement in the Oval Office before leaving for another trip to the hurricane-battered Gulf Coast.

Bush met with Roberts at the White House on Sunday evening for about a half an hour and then offered him the top position at the Supreme Court on Monday morning, an administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity because Bush had not announced his selection, told The Associated Press.

Paper shuffling
Bush already had nominated Roberts to fill the seat of retiring Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. It would just take a little paper shuffling to change the nomination for Rehnquist’s seat.

The president still wants Roberts to be on the bench when the Supreme Court resumes its work on Oct. 3, the official said. That means Bush would have to find a new nominee for O’Connor’s seat. She has offered to remain on the bench until a successor is seated.

Rehnquist, 80 at his death late Saturday, served on the Supreme Court for 33 years and was its leader for 19 years.

Rehnquist, a World War II Army Air Corps veteran, will be buried in a private ceremony at Arlington National Cemetery alongside his wife, who died in 1991, following a funeral that morning at St. Matthew’s Cathedral in Washington.

His body will lie in repose in the marble Great Hall of the Supreme Court building on Tuesday and on Wednesday morning with the public invited to pay its respects.

Five members of the court have lain in repose there: Chief Justices Earl Warren and Warren Burger, and Justices Thurgood Marshall, William Brennan and Harry Blackmun.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9215790/

Bob
09-14-2005, 11:48 AM
I watched part of this yesterday and I was impressed with the man and how he responded to these Senators and questions. The thing I don't get is that people want to know his personal opinion on certain 'key' topics however a judge's duty is to make decisions based on the laws passed by Congress so why would his personal opinions be of any concern? Yeah he hasn't answered any of those questions outright and no S.C. nominee has in the past so why should we expect this to be different. The thing I've liked about him that is different from the other confirmations that I researched and seen is that his responses are quick, intelligent and calm. He appears to be one of those few 'good people' left in society. Kudos to Dubya on this one.

On a sidenote, our next president will be someone who has the image of intelligence, I believe. Regardless of good and bad that Dubya has performed to date, I think the American people are looking for someone who can outwit his opponents instead of throwing the military at them. Now its just a question of finding that person. Just my .02

sws4420
09-14-2005, 12:07 PM
They're asking him to commit himself to an opinion on certain topics so they can use such a litmus test to see whether or not they'll get the vote out of him that they want. He is handling all of their questions like a champ. I'd vote for this guy for president.

Cutesunshine
09-14-2005, 12:10 PM
Yeah, he is well spoken, Sincere and seems very unbiased. He comes from a great background.
I too, would vote for him for president.

Bob
09-14-2005, 12:21 PM
With mine that makes it 3-0.

sws4420
09-14-2005, 02:36 PM
Only problem is that once he's Chief Justice, he won't ever have to deal with public life or public scrutiny ever again.

Bob
09-14-2005, 02:41 PM
Only problem is that once he's Chief Justice, he won't ever have to deal with public life or public scrutiny ever again.
And yet the irony is they decide public life as interpreted by the law.