PDA

View Full Version : House Approves Strip Search Bill



sws4420
09-21-2006, 09:10 AM
A bill approved by the U.S. House yesterday would require school districts around the country to establish policies making it easier for teachers and school officials to conduct wide scale searches of students. These searches could take the form of pat-downs, bag searches, or strip searches depending on how administrators interpret the law.

The Student Teacher Safety Act of 2006 (HR 5295) would require any school receiving federal funding--essentially every public school--to adopt policies allowing teachers and school officials to conduct random, warrantless searches of every student, at any time, on the flimsiest of pretexts. Saying they suspect that one student might have drugs could give officials the authority to search every student in the building.

DPA supporters and others who opposed this outrageous bill called their members of Congress this week to express their disapproval. However, House leaders circumvented the usual legislative procedure to bring the bill to a quick vote. It did not pass through the committee process, but went straight to the House floor. There, it was passed by a simple voice vote, so constituents cannot even find out how their Representative voted.

The bill moves next to the Senate, but it is unlikely to be considered there this session.

Bill Piper, DPA's director of national affairs, said, "It looks like this bill was rushed to the House floor to help out the sponsor, Rep. Geoff Davis (R-KY/4th), who is in a tight re-election race. This vote lets him say he's getting things done in Washington. But I would be surprised to see a similar push in the Senate."

HR 5295 is opposed in its current form by several groups, including the Drug Policy Alliance, Students for Sensible Drug Policy, the ACLU, the American Federation of Teachers, the National Parent Teacher Association, the American Association of School Administrators, and the National School Boards Association.

DPA will be watching the bill so that if and when it does come up again, this wide array of opponents can mobilize to stop it.


http://www.drugpolicy.org/news/092006search.cfm

MedicCook
09-21-2006, 11:59 AM
The first problem I have is that this is being pushed through the wrong way. It did not make it through a commitee vote, but went to the Reps to vote and then they did not even cast ballots to prove who voted yes or no.

I would be OK with student searches with special conditions. The teachers should not be the one's doing the searches. A school needs to have a security person doing the search. By security I don't mean an armed guard, but select people who are trained in proper search procedures. All physical searches must be done by the same gender. There has to be a clear cut reason for the search also. This is a touchy area because it can easily step on these kids civil rights.

This bill as it is currently set up should not be allowed the way it is written.

sws4420
09-21-2006, 01:14 PM
The instant anyone tries to search my kid, I want to be noitified. If anyone tries to strip search my kid, heads will roll, law or not.

MedicCook
09-21-2006, 01:24 PM
This is definately something that needs more discussion before it goes to a mandate. It should become more of a guidline that schools can choose to follow, and allow the schools to research the best policy to do things.